|
.png)
- Allow new food chemicals linked to cancer and reproductive harm to be considered “safe.”
- Retroactively approve all food chemicals currently considered generally recognized as safe (GRAS).
- Allow new chemicals to be added to food if the FDA does not respond to a GRAS notice within 90 days.
- Allow new chemicals reviewed by industry-funded expert panels – including the flavor industry’s notorious “expert” panel – to be automatically GRAS and used in food immediately.
Under the “GRAS loophole,” which Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr, has vowed to close (this has not happened yet), chemical companies – not the FDA – decide whether a food chemical is safe. For new chemicals, companies submit a GRAS notice to the FDA, and the FDA responds with a “no questions” letter.
As an EWG analysis found, since 2000, almost all new chemicals – nearly 99% – have come onto the market through the GRAS loophole.
The system is already inadequate; this act would make it worse (here’s my contribution to this discussion from more than a decade ago).
Helena Bottemiller Evich says in Food Fix: Food industry quietly advances its preemption push in Washington
Right now, preemption is becoming even more critical for industry because MAHA groups and consumer advocates have been having a ton of success in state legislatures. In many cases, the industry is actually getting creamed outside of Washington.
She notes that the New York legislature has just required companies to publicly disclose any additivies they self-determine to be GRAS (it also bans Red 3, propylparaben, and potassium bromate in the state).
This kind of action makes the food industry long for federal preemption.
Secretary Kennedy and the MAHA movement have promised to fix all this. Will they be able to?
Stay tuned.
