Latest from Food Politics: The hyper-marketing of protein, continued

Most people who eat enough calories get more than enough of the protein they need, so the current protein craze—putting pea, whey, and tofu into everything—doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. It does sell products though. It’s hard to choose from ...

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 

By Marion Nestle August 06 2026 The hyper-marketing of protein, continued Most people who eat enough calories get more than enough of the protein they need, so the current protein craze—putting pea, whey, and tofu into everything—doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. It does sell products though. It’s hard to choose from among the most entertaining protein-supplemented products. Coffee? Protein water? Pop-Tarts? But this remains my current favorite. We can—and should—ask: How Sound Is Broad Advice to Simply “Eat More Protein?” Protein has become the centerpiece of popular nutrition advice. Grocery store shelves are lined with protein-enhanced everything. Social media influencers urge us to squeeze more protein into every meal. And now the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is offering broad advice: simply eat more protein. And look at the effects of this trend: America’s Protein Boom Is Outgrowing Its Supply: Demand for whey is soaring as more Americans seek out high-protein foods and GLP-1 medications reshape eating habits. Why can’t manufacturers simply make more? And the USDA says Animal protein continues to be plentiful for U.S. consumers. They don’t include dairy on this chart and I have not seen a similar one for plant proteins, but plenty of those are available too. I wish everyone would stop worrying about protein.  It’s not a nutritional issue; it’s a marketing issue. ___________________ Arriving Sept 8. For a 30% discount, pre-order here using code UCPSAVE30.   The post The hyper-marketing of protein, continued appeared first on Food Politics by Marion Nestle      Related Posts Annals of food marketing: weird, wonderful, and profitable What will the FDA do about peptides? Industry-funded study of the week: plant v. animal proteins   Now Available: What to Eat Now My new book, What to Eat Now, is officially out! It's both a field guide to food shopping in America and a reflection on how to eat well—and deliciously. For more information and to order, click here. You can explore the full archive of this (almost) daily blog at foodpolitics.com, where you'll also find information about my books, articles, media interviews, upcoming lectures, favorite resources, and FAQs. Visit the Site » ​​​​​​​ Marion Nestle Paulette Goddard Professor of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health at New York University, Emerita © Marion Nestle. You're receiving this email because you've signed up to receive updates from us. If you'd prefer not to receive updates, you can unsubscribe. Safely Unsubscribe • Archives • Preferences • Contact • Subscribe • Privacy

---

Email subscriptions powered by FeedBlitz® • 650 E. Palisade Avenue Ste 2, PO Box 173 • Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632

Latest from Food Politics: MAHA's one achievement so far: voluntary elimination of artificial food colors

RFK Jr’s Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) made many promises, most of them still in the works.   But one seems to be well on the way to being achieved.   Under MAHA pressure, some companies agreed to voluntarily remove petroleum-based food colors ...

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 

By Marion Nestle August 05 2026 MAHA’s one achievement so far: voluntary elimination of artificial food colors RFK Jr’s Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) made many promises, most of them still in the works.  But one seems to be well on the way to being achieved.  Under MAHA pressure, some companies agreed to voluntarily remove petroleum-based food colors by the end of 2027. I went to the Target in Ithaca, NY last week and could not fine a single kids’ cereal containing the dyes Red 40, Yellow 5 and 6, and Blue 1. Target promised not to sell cereals with those dyes.  It has kept that promise. But the Ithaca Tops still carries Froot Loops and other brightly colored, artificially dyed kids’ cereals.  Maybe they will be gone by the end of 2027? This is a voluntary initiative.  No regulation is involved, to the great dismay of advocates. The shift to vegetable-based dyes Nestlé USA removes artificial colors in all food and beverages:  The Nesquik maker joined other food manufacturers last year in pledging to eliminate synthetic dyes from the rest of its portfolio following pressure from the Trump administration. General Mills launches Trix, Lucky Charms cereals with natural colors: The Cotton Candy and “Moana” varieties will debut this summer, the same time the food giant expects to remove synthetic dyes across its cereals. How is it going? How the shift away from artificial dyes is impacting food sales: Sales of products with natural colors grew more than those using synthetic dyes, a report from the National Confectioners Association and RTI International found. One Year Later: Are Synthetic Dyes Still in Our Food? Despite growing consumer concern and awareness of synthetic dyes, the Food and Drug Administration has not taken action to ban them in full. Instead, last year, the FDA called on food manufacturers to voluntarily phase them out of their products. While a number of companies have made significant commitments toward that end, others have committed to much more limited changes. Kennedy touts food dye crackdown as a midterm win, but big holdouts remain: Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced plans to phase out all artificial dyes from the food supply by the end of 2026. Roughly half of the major food companies have agreed to do so, though only four are meeting that deadline. Why vegetable colors are a challenge for makers of ultra-processed foods Natural Colour Industry Prepares for Major Shift: The global colour industry is bracing for an unprecedented period of growth in natural colour demand due to widespread U.S. market conversion from synthetic dyes. Sensient is making major investments to secure supply and production capacity… Learn more Mars’ artificial-dye-free push hits major reformulation hurdles: Mars to introduce artificial-colour-free M&M’s but reformulation challenges leave two colours out in the cold… Read more Why food scientists still can’t crack the perfect natural red: Creating a heat-stable natural red remains one of food science’s toughest colour challenges… Read more Comment Advocacy groups like CSPI have for years called for removal of these dyes.  Since they are long gone from Europe, Australia, and other countries, you would think they would be easy to replace. The problem?  Kids (and adults) think cereals and candy taste better when they are brightly colored.  Vegetable dyes are not vivid enough. When General Mills took the dyes out of Trix some years ago, sales went down.  General Mills reinstated the dyes. RFK Jr has explicitly stated that he opposes regulation (“nanny state”).  Hence, voluntary. If companies can remove the dyes voluntarily, they can also volunteer to put them back. This is a lost opportunity. ____________________ Arriving Sept 8. For a 30% discount, pre-order here using code UCPSAVE30.   The post MAHA’s one achievement so far: voluntary elimination of artificial food colors appeared first on Food Politics by Marion Nestle      Related Posts Weekend reading: What the Trump administration has done to SNAP—and to grocery stores A special thank you to readers for comments on “Setting the Record Straight: Calley Means What has MAHA accomplished to date?   Now Available: What to Eat Now My new book, What to Eat Now, is officially out! It's both a field guide to food shopping in America and a reflection on how to eat well—and deliciously. For more information and to order, click here. You can explore the full archive of this (almost) daily blog at foodpolitics.com, where you'll also find information about my books, articles, media interviews, upcoming lectures, favorite resources, and FAQs. Visit the Site » ​​​​​​​ Marion Nestle Paulette Goddard Professor of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health at New York University, Emerita © Marion Nestle. You're receiving this email because you've signed up to receive updates from us. If you'd prefer not to receive updates, you can unsubscribe. Safely Unsubscribe • Archives • Preferences • Contact • Subscribe • Privacy

---

Email subscriptions powered by FeedBlitz® • 650 E. Palisade Avenue Ste 2, PO Box 173 • Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632