Lifestyle Sports

Tuesday, September 26, 2023

[New post] Tom Ford Revisited

Site logo image Style On The Dot posted: " The brand may have a new designer, but old Tom Ford is new Tom Ford. Let's start from Gucci Big changes at Tom Ford were not exactly expected leading up to the brand's "highly anticipated" spring/summer 2024 show in Milan. The now-Estee-Lauder" Style on the Dot

Tom Ford Revisited

Style On The Dot

Sep 21

The brand may have a new designer, but old Tom Ford is new Tom Ford. Let's start from Gucci

Big changes at Tom Ford were not exactly expected leading up to the brand's "highly anticipated" spring/summer 2024 show in Milan. The now-Estee-Lauder-owned label's new guy Peter Hawkings, a veteran employee who has worked with Mr Ford for 25 years, was supposed to bring the name into a new era. But he did not. It is possible that the Tom Ford style of sex, glamour, and retro-pertoire has, through the decades, seeped deep into Mr Hawkings's pores. And now he breathes Tom Ford stertorously. Yet, his debut's charmless homage seemed more like boot-licking: To prove that he could be just like his former boss, and, therefore, a worthy successor. So the collection had to be steep in the glory days of Tom Ford. In the show notes, the brand called Mr Hawkings's barefaced fawning over the Tom Ford of the past—and, frankly, present—"an act of continuity".

The need for brand-identity cohesion is understandable, but the continuation of something that has possibly reached saturation point? Mr Ford had shown some "iconic" looks at the height of his career, brought skin-baring sexiness to a point that it was—and still is—dubbed somewhat tragically "trademark", and amplified American-style glamorama for parties and after-parties, forming the crux of what he offered, going back to his Gucci years. All these play-backs were so evident even in Mr Ford's last show that he seemed to be parodying himself. How much of the good of the past can you really throw into a mix that purports to now give the label a fresh spin without it looking stale, vapid, rehashed? Or devoid of real ideas? For Mr Hawkings, unknown until he was appointed in April, quite a lot. On the runway, there was, thankfully, no disco beat that the late Dan Hartman would enthusiastically approve or anything that recall, without a smidgen of wit, Studio 54.

But the savour of the Seventies hung in the air like stale Tom Ford perfume, even in the scented show space. Mr Hawkings wasted no time in proving that he was right for the job by delving straight into the past work of his former boss. Just after the opening look, we were thrust into the familiar: Dresses so clearly from Mr Ford's 1996 all-sex-up-with-somewhere-to-go Gucci collection. Mr Hawking referenced the last six dresses (the final piece of the sextet worn by the still-modelling Kate Moss) that were inspired by Halston, except that Mr Hawkings's were now in black. And the belts-as-waist jewellery were there too as evocative of the past as the way the dresses were presently worn. But those dresses were not the only looks from 1996 that Mr Hawkings mined. There were, too, those velvet suits under which silk shirts were worn unbuttoned to the navel, a look that would be made famous (and reprised in 2021 at the Gucci Love Parade show) by Gwyneth Paltrow. There are those for whom Tom Ford's Gucci is the veritable security blanket.

Mr Hawkings's confidence came under the canonical aegis of more than Gucci by Tom Ford. There was Saint Laurent by Tom Ford (satin safari jacket and such!) and Tom Ford by Tom Ford (leather biker jackets and such!). After a while everything became a blur: Just Tom Ford. It was as if Mr Ford had not left. Not only did Mr Hawkings put out a debut collection that could have been executed by the brand founder's very own hands, he seemed to want to be Tom Ford. In his appearance at the end of the show, he took his bow in a foppish white suit and a V-neck T-shirt, made all the more authentic with a pair of squarish vintage-y frames. Very quickly, it dawned us that the collection shared the same adjective as the Tom Ford 2018 fragrance named after the cherry: Lost.

Comment
Like
Tip icon image You can also reply to this email to leave a comment.

Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from Style on the Dot.
Change your email settings at manage subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://styleonthedot.com/2023/09/21/tom-ford-revisited/

WordPress.com and Jetpack Logos

Get the Jetpack app to use Reader anywhere, anytime

Follow your favorite sites, save posts to read later, and get real-time notifications for likes and comments.

Download Jetpack on Google Play Download Jetpack from the App Store
WordPress.com on Twitter WordPress.com on Facebook WordPress.com on Instagram WordPress.com on YouTube
WordPress.com Logo and Wordmark title=

Automattic, Inc. - 60 29th St. #343, San Francisco, CA 94110  

at September 26, 2023
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

The Guardian - Travel: Europe - new message

- ...

  • Your Newspaper, 28th of May
    - ...
  • [New post] Where Do You Go When You Need Wisdom? Who Will Be Your Counselor?
    Miche...
  • [New post] See Now, Buy Now: This Buck Mason Shawl Cardigan is One of the Best Men’s Winter Sweaters
    Beau H. posted: " Perhaps you've experienced this phenomenon recently: Dealing with a frigid day without one of the...

Search This Blog

  • Home

About Me

Lifestyle Sports Return
View my complete profile

Report Abuse

Blog Archive

  • January 2026 (49)
  • December 2025 (50)
  • November 2025 (45)
  • October 2025 (48)
  • September 2025 (49)
  • August 2025 (51)
  • July 2025 (56)
  • June 2025 (45)
  • May 2025 (30)
  • April 2025 (32)
  • March 2025 (31)
  • February 2025 (25)
  • January 2025 (27)
  • December 2024 (26)
  • November 2024 (28)
  • October 2024 (29)
  • September 2024 (1602)
  • August 2024 (1542)
  • July 2024 (1563)
  • June 2024 (1584)
  • May 2024 (1696)
  • April 2024 (1567)
  • March 2024 (1976)
  • February 2024 (1977)
  • January 2024 (2065)
  • December 2023 (1865)
  • November 2023 (1376)
  • October 2023 (1078)
  • September 2023 (800)
  • August 2023 (689)
  • July 2023 (662)
  • June 2023 (650)
  • May 2023 (706)
  • April 2023 (614)
  • March 2023 (615)
  • February 2023 (582)
  • January 2023 (673)
  • December 2022 (639)
  • November 2022 (575)
  • October 2022 (576)
  • September 2022 (530)
  • August 2022 (598)
  • July 2022 (807)
  • June 2022 (985)
  • May 2022 (988)
  • April 2022 (926)
  • March 2022 (551)
  • February 2022 (426)
  • January 2022 (450)
  • December 2021 (946)
  • November 2021 (2978)
  • October 2021 (3085)
  • September 2021 (3021)
  • August 2021 (3025)
  • July 2021 (3182)
  • June 2021 (3125)
  • May 2021 (296)
Powered by Blogger.